Backtesting credit risk models

Backtesting is the general method for seeing how well a strategy or model would have done ex-post. Backtesting assesses the viability of a trading strategy by discovering how it would play out using historical data. If backtesting works, traders and analysts may have the confidence to employ it going forward. Backtesting can be an important step in optimizing your trading strategy.

Backtesting allows a trader to simulate a trading strategy using historical data to generate results and analyze risk and profitability before risking any actual capital. A well-conducted backtest that yields positive results assures traders that the strategy is fundamentally sound and is likely to yield profits when implemented in reality. A well-conducted backtest that yields suboptimal results will prompt traders to alter or reject the strategy.

Particularly complicated trading strategies, such as strategies implemented by automated trading systems, rely heavily on backtesting to prove their worth, as they are too arcane to evaluate otherwise.

As long as a trading idea can be quantified, it can be backtested. Some traders and investors may seek the expertise of a qualified programmer to develop the idea into a testable form. The programmer can incorporate user-defined input variables that allow the trader to "tweak" the system.

The trader would be able to input or change the lengths of the two moving averages used in the system.

Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models - final document

The trader could backtest to determine which lengths of moving averages would have performed the best on the historical data. The ideal backtest chooses sample data from a relevant time period of a duration that reflects a variety of market conditions.

In this way, one can better judge whether the results of the backtest represent a fluke or sound trading. The historical data set must include a truly representative sample of stocks, including those of companies which eventually went bankrupt or were sold or liquidated.

The alternative, including only data from historical stocks that are still around today, will produce artificially high returns in backtesting. Traders should ensure that their backtesting software accounts for these costs.

Forward performance testing is a simulation of actual trading and involves following the system's logic in a live market.

backtesting credit risk models

It is also called paper trading since all trades are executed on paper only; that is, trade entries and exits are documented along with any profit or loss for the system, but no real trades are executed. An important aspect of forward performance testing is to follow the system's logic exactly; otherwise, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to accurately evaluate this step of the process.

While backtesting uses actual historical data to test for fit or success, scenario analysis makes use of hypothetical data that simulates various possible outcomes. For instance, scenario analysis will simulate specific changes in the values of the portfolio's securities or key factors take place, such as a change in the interest rate. Scenario analysis is commonly used to estimate changes to a portfolio's value in response to an unfavorable event, and may be used to examine a theoretical worst-case scenario.

For backtesting to provide meaningful results, traders must develop their strategies and test them in good faith, avoiding bias as much as possible. That means the strategy should be developed without relying on the data used in backtesting. Traders generally build strategies based on historical data. They must be strict about testing with different data sets from those they train their models on.

Otherwise, the backtest will produce glowing results that mean nothing. Similarly, traders must also avoid data dredging, in which they test a wide range of hypothetical strategies against the same set of data with will also produce successes that fail in real-time markets, because there are many invalid strategies that would beat the market over a specific time period by chance. One way to compensate for the tendency to data dredge or cherry pick is to use a strategy that succeeds in the relevant, or in-sample, time period and backtest it with data from a different, or out-of-sample, time period.

If in-sample and out-of-sample backtests yield similar results, then they are likely generally valid. Technical Analysis Basic Education.Backtesting is a term used in modeling to refer to testing a predictive model on historical data.

Backtesting is a type of retrodictionand a special type of cross-validation applied to previous time period s. In a trading strategy, investment strategy, or risk modeling, backtesting seeks to estimate the performance of a strategy or model if it had been employed during a past period.

This requires simulating past conditions with sufficient detail, making one limitation of backtesting the need for detailed historical data. A second limitation is the inability to model strategies that would affect historic prices. Finally, backtesting, like other modeling, is limited by potential overfitting.

That is, it is often possible to find a strategy that would have worked well in the past, but will not work well in the future. Backtesting has historically only been performed by large institutions and professional money managers due to the expense of obtaining and using detailed datasets. However, backtrading is increasingly used on a wider basis, and independent web-based backtesting platforms have emerged. Although the technique is widely used, it is prone to weaknesses. In oceanography [5] and meteorology[6] backtesting is also known as hindcasting : a hindcast is a way of testing a mathematical model ; researchers enter known or closely estimated inputs for past events into the model to see how well the output matches the known results.

Hindcasting usually refers to a numerical-model integration of a historical period where no observations have been assimilated. This distinguishes a hindcast run from a reanalysis.

Extend the reach of debt capital markets with deep credit insights.

Oceanographic observations of salinity and temperature as well as observations of surface-wave parameters such as the significant wave height are much scarcer than meteorological observations, making hindcasting more common in oceanography than in meteorology. Also, since surface waves represent a forced system where the wind is the only generating force, wave hindcasting is often considered adequate for generating a reasonable representation of the wave climate with little need for a full reanalysis.

Hydrologists use hindcasting for model stream flows. An example of hindcasting would be entering climate forcings events that force change into a climate model. If the hindcast showed reasonably-accurate climate response, the model would be considered successful.

backtesting credit risk models

The ECMWF re-analysis is an example of a combined atmospheric reanalysis coupled with a wave-model integration where no wave parameters were assimilated, making the wave part a hindcast run. InDake Chen and his colleagues initially "trained" a computerusing the data of the surface temperature of the oceans from the last 20 years. Then, having "trained" the computer, they conducted a hindcasting exercise using data that had been collected on the surface temperature of the oceans for the period to From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Basle Committee on Banking Supervision.The BIS hosts nine international organisations engaged in standard setting and the pursuit of financial stability through the Basel Process.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has issued today a consultative document on Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models. This supervisory guidance reinforces and explains some of the proposed changes to the Basel II framework included in the consultative document Strengthening the resilience of the banking sectorwhich was issued for comment in December Today's sound practices for backtesting paper provides additional information on supervisory expectations as well as recommendations to strengthen the backtesting of internal assessments of counterparty credit risk exposures.

Banks that have received supervisory permission to use internal model methods to calculate regulatory capital are required to validate their models on an ongoing basis. Backtesting is an integral element of the model validation process and the financial crisis has revealed that additional guidance in this area is required. The Committee believes that implementation of these sound practices will improve the backtesting of banks' models and, as a result, will enhance the resilience of individual banks and the financial system.

Comments on this consultative document should be submitted by 31 May by email baselcommittee bis. This website requires javascript for proper use. About BIS The BIS's mission is to serve central banks in their pursuit of monetary and financial stability, to foster international cooperation in those areas and to act as a bank for central banks. Read more about the BIS.

Central bank hub The BIS facilitates dialogue, collaboration and information-sharing among central banks and other authorities that are responsible for promoting financial stability. Read more about our central bank hub. Statistics BIS statistics on the international financial system shed light on issues related to global financial stability.

Read more about our statistics. Banking services The BIS offers a wide range of financial services to central banks and other official monetary authorities. Read more about our banking services. Visit the media centre. In this section:. Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models Summary of document history. Previous version Previous consultation This version Subsequent consultation Subsequent version.

Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models - final document. Topics: Credit risk. Top Share this page. Stay connected.

About BIS.Remember Me. One of our representatives will be in touch soon to help get you started with your demo. Model backtesting and recalibration are important and natural stages in the lifecycle of any statistical model and should be performed on an annual basis. The models form part of the Credit Analytics offering.

We produce annual backtesting reports for each of our models, which provide comprehensive assessments on model performance using the data from the most recent calendar year. Whenever significant model performance deterioration is observed in the annual model backtesting process, model recalibration becomes necessary.

Our quantitative credit risk models are developed based on an extensive database including company financials and other market-driven information, as well as macroeconomic and socio-economic factors and advanced optimization techniques, and typically have strong in-sample model performance during development.

However, the out-of-sample model performance on new datasets may also be important for risk managers. Generally speaking, a good predictive statistical model should demonstrate good in-sample performance, as well as excellent and stable backtesting out-of-sample performance.

Otherwise, it may indicate problems during development such as overfitting, multi-collinearity, etc. Next, important and relevant statistics are generated that are used to measure model performance during development.

If all performance results are satisfactory, we conclude that our models can continue to serve their purposes.

Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models

Since different models utilize distinct modeling techniques and methodologies due to differing objectives, the corresponding performance metrics may vary from one model to another.

The following primary test results are presented in the main part of the annual backtesting report:. Display the trends of PD values of defaulters and non-defaulters within two years prior to default. Monte Carlo tests are used to compare the level of estimated PDs and observed default frequency under different correlation assumptions between input variables.

We provide primary backtesting results mainly from three perspectives:. In general, higher match ratio statistics and lower neutrality are indicators of good model performance. The table below displays additional information shown in the Appendix of annual backtesting reports. Separate the backtesting sample into two asset classes and generate match ratio statistics and neutrality. Generally speaking, a predictive statistical model could function very well for a few years after release.

In this case, model recalibration becomes necessary and is usually triggered by a significant deterioration in the annual model backtesting results when compared to the original model development. Hence, regardless of model performance deterioration, we recalibrate models around every four to six years.

Moreover, whenever we kick-off a model recalibration, we also try to incorporate client feedback. The table below outlines the major changes for the recalibrated Credit Analytics models that will be released in The common feature is that the recalibrated models include recent observations in the training process, while their performance remains at a similarly high level or becomes better.

Log in to other products. Contact Us. We generated a verification code for you. Clicking 'Request' means you agree to the Terms and have read and understood the Privacy Policy.Backtesting is a general and widely used procedure for evaluating model performance for certain types of financial models. Backtesting is similar to an out-of-sample cross- validation process, but differs in that it is an ongoing exercise post model deployment rather than a step in model development or validation process.

Backtesting compares the latest set of model predictions against actual realizations, with the validation sample being formed by an independent segment of data. Backtesting market risk VaR is a long-time regulatory requirement [1] and well developed practice. Daily VaR estimates are compared with the ex-post PnL realizations. Instances where the realization exceeds the estimate are denoted exceptions.

Assuming independence of market shocks over time for any given VaR system there is a certain expected frequency of such exceptions. Toggle navigation. Discussion View source History. Backtesting From Open Risk Manual. Jump to: navigationsearch. Follow us on Linkedin Read our Blog.The value at risk is a statistical risk management technique that monitors and quantifies the risk level associated with an investment portfolio.

The value at risk measures the maximum amount of loss over a specified time horizon with a given confidence level. Backtesting measures the accuracy of the value at risk calculations. The loss forecast calculated by the value at risk is compared with actual losses at the end of the specified time horizon. Backtesting is a technique for simulating a model or strategy on past data to gauge its accuracy and effectiveness.

Backtesting in value at risk is used to compare the predicted losses from the calculated value at risk with the actual losses realized at the end of the specified time horizon. This comparison identifies the periods where the value at risk is underestimated or where the portfolio losses are greater than the original expected value at risk. Value at risk predictions can be recalculated if the backtesting values are not accurate, thereby reducing the risk of unexpected losses.

Value at risk calculates the potential maximum losses over a specified time horizon with a certain degree of confidence. If the value at risk is simulated over the past yearly data and the actual portfolio losses have not exceeded the expected value at risk losses, then the calculated value at risk is an appropriate measure. On the other hand, if the actual portfolio losses exceed the calculated value at risk losses, then the expected value at risk calculation may not be accurate. When the actual portfolio losses are greater than the calculated value at risk estimated loss, it is known as a breach of value at risk.

However, if the actual portfolio loss is above the estimated value at risk only a few times, it doesn't mean that the estimated value at risk has failed. The frequency of breaches needs to be determined. There is only a problem with the value at risk estimates when breaches occur more than 13 days out of days; this signals the value at risk estimate is inaccurate and needs to be re-evaluated.

Business Essentials. Tools for Fundamental Analysis. Portfolio Management. Risk Management. Your Money. Personal Finance.

backtesting credit risk models

Your Practice. Popular Courses. Investing Portfolio Management. Compare Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. Related Articles. Partner Links. Related Terms How Risk Analysis Works Risk analysis is the process of assessing the likelihood of an adverse event occurring within the corporate, government, or environmental sector.

Market Risk Definition Market risk is the possibility of an investor experiencing losses due to factors that affect the overall performance of the financial markets.

Risk Management in Finance In the financial world, risk management is the process of identification, analysis and acceptance or mitigation of uncertainty in investment decisions. Risk management occurs anytime an investor or fund manager analyzes and attempts to quantify the potential for losses in an investment.

Incremental Value At Risk Incremental value at risk is the amount of uncertainty added or subtracted from a portfolio by purchasing a new investment or selling an existing one.

What Is Nonlinearity? Options have a high degree of nonlinearity, which may make them seem unpredictable.

What Is Backtesting in Value at Risk (VaR)?

Learn about nonlinearity and how to manage your options trading risk.The FSB monitors and assesses vulnerabilities affecting the global financial system and proposes actions needed to address them.

In addition, it monitors and advises on market and systemic developments, and their implications for regulatory policy. See More. Annual monitoring exercise to assess global trends and risks in non-bank financial intermediation. Read More. This document sets out the principle terminology used in IMM backtesting, discusses backtesting and presents examples of IMM backtesting good practice. Given the intimate relationship between backtesting and validation, this document also lays out other sound practices that banks should consider in conjunction with backtesting.

Toggle navigation Toggle Search. Vulnerabilities Assessment The FSB monitors and assesses vulnerabilities affecting the global financial system and proposes actions needed to address them.

Latest Publications. Global Monitoring Report on Non-Bank Financial Intermediation Annual monitoring exercise to assess global trends and risks in non-bank financial intermediation. Latest Press Releases. Sound practices for backtesting counterparty credit risk models - final document. Legal Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *